SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Carragher who wrote (3453)10/23/2006 4:38:03 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10087
 
If its difficult and if low income people usually don't itemize that would mean they don't get the deduction, which would make it even less an example of a successful war on poverty program.

I'm not dwelling on this one piece the only reason I mentioned it was that you mentioned more people owning homes as an example of how the war on poverty has done well.

What is and isn't part of the "war on poverty" isn't exactly engraved in stone, but generally programs targeted at the poor are considered part of the war on poverty, while other programs are not. For example food stamps would be part, but social security retirement benefits wouldn't be, even if they do help pull some people out of poverty.



To: John Carragher who wrote (3453)10/23/2006 4:39:55 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10087
 
let's disagree.

It seems to me what what you disagree about is the definition of poor. IMO, poor people can't afford rent. Moving up from rent to home ownership is for the middle class. Rent subsidies are part of the war on poverty, not home ownership programs.