SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: haqihana who wrote (13648)10/25/2006 1:01:21 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 71588
 
"Too many people saw something there, but the authorities would not believe them."

Believe? Or, had a need to dismiss them? In the end it looked like a nice bundled up package. Neat and tidy. It gave closure to many.



To: haqihana who wrote (13648)10/26/2006 10:54:14 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 71588
 
As Democrats go JFK might not have been so bad. At least he cut taxes, and he didn't expand the federal government in the way or to the extent FDR or LBJ did.

None of which means I exactly agree with him, or don't think he is overrated by many, but I'd probably rather have someone like him as president than someone the Democrats are likely to select in 2008.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News