SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougSF30 who wrote (214930)10/25/2006 2:57:36 PM
From: BUGGI-WORead Replies (3) | Respond to of 275872
 
@Doug - 65nm
What would you do, if AMD finally (I know) delivers 3,2G in
2006!!! Shipments, not anouncements. What would you say, if
AMD sees now a fast(er) ramp for speeds on 65nm compared to
90nm?

BUGGI



To: dougSF30 who wrote (214930)10/25/2006 3:07:57 PM
From: jspeedRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
It didn't happen.

If Bob Rivet actually said that, with as much negative press/analysis as AMD gets, "AMD's 65 nm slip" would be printed in 20 articles a day. There would be analysts doubting that AMD was producing 65nm until it hit the store shelves.

Fess up. This is figment of your imagination and fanboy bias. You let some website convince you on the basis of some half-baked theory.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News