Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JGoren who wrote (56428)	10/30/2006 8:56:36 AM
From: JeffreyHF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196699

Briefing.com just repeated the Bloomberg "worst case scenario" piece. If the EC, after years of litigation, were to find against Qualcomm and fine them the maximum, wouldn`t their jurisdiction be limited to European profits from IPR? We could lose more market cap today than that.

To: JGoren who wrote (56428)	10/30/2006 8:59:36 AM
From: blimfark	Respond to of 196699

I've written to Mr Newman and copied the SEC. (see link). It's all probably pointless, but my Mother taught me to speak up when somebody does something to hurt you. Anybody else on this board interested in venting using your keyboard? I'd also welcome some other e-mail addresses inside of Bloomberg, Spitzer's office or the SEC (or maybe Big Lou from Brooklyn) or for that matter anybody who would listen. If for no other reason than it might cause Mr Newman to practice more objective journalism. Yeah I'm pissed. Sorry for the rant. investorshub.com

To: JGoren who wrote (56428)	10/30/2006 9:00:33 AM
From: JeffreyHF	Respond to of 196699

JGoren, how would the EC have jurisdiction to now effectively renegotiate the complex settlement agreement/cross-license that Ericsson and Qualcomm negotiated in the context of U.S. based litigation in 1999?

To: JGoren who wrote (56428)	10/30/2006 11:05:42 AM
From: BDAZZ	Respond to of 196699

>>Timing is too incredible.<< I remember one of my posts a couple of months ago was a show of faith the Euro process was on the up and up, but it's all too apparent they waited for months until the most opportune time for the POS to release this news. Those poor bastards. The real farce is that this is all about an investigation of abuse of power.

To: JGoren who wrote (56428)	10/30/2006 1:32:14 PM
From: lml	Respond to of 196699

Looks like the cabal has it's war room operating to negate the effect of the Broadcomm injunction. Timing is too incredible. On its face, I basically agree. The presumption is that this "leak" was timing sensitive. IMHO, any prudent investor or legal strategist should always question the timing to any news release, development or statement. Sometimes the answer might be incidental; other times it might be intentional. Nevertheless, such questioning can provide insight that can assist in the investment decision or legal strategy at-hand.