Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LoneClone who wrote (13259)	10/30/2006 11:35:06 AM
From: Bread Upon The Water	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25575

Sniff, sniff, sniff---yes that odor----political correctness is in the air for sure.

To: LoneClone who wrote (13259)	10/30/2006 3:42:51 PM
From: Fishfinder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25575

RE HUMMERS Totally agreed I also believe that the POO should be in a price range where it forces humanity to start to listen to what lies ahead for the future of oil and how future oil shortages are going to affect our lives. But the big problem associated with $100.00 oil, is that the poorer economys will come to a stand still, while the rest of us would only start to listen. At $60.00 oil, I don't think anyone in the so called 1st reqally gives a poop. It almost seems like the world should devise a plan to charge different prices for oil depending on each nations economies. ( UUUhhh, I don't believe I just said that). BUT what else can we do?? scott