Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: slacker711 who wrote (58396)	11/9/2006 11:41:10 AM
From: inaflash	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 213182

I know that Microsoft desperately wants/needs a music strategy but I cant believe they would agree to this.... Not a bad idea for big content providers, but dividing this pie is going to get interesting. The idea is that if they can't control the software, they may as well profit from the hardware. They had enough pull for Macrovision, but computer technology has worked around that temporary fix. Now they're using their pull to try to exact their fees thru this "iPod tax" concept, which is similar to the media tax that some countries use. It's an interesting idea, but the difficult thing is being fair to users and producers. The media tax is very unfair for some users, and now taxing MP3 players the same way is going to add to the confusion. If Universal gets 1%, what about the other major labels? And what about the independents? By the time everyone is bought in, the percentage of this goes up significantly, maybe double digits, and still, some producers are left out. To further complicate matters, the royalties from hardware dwarf the likely software/content losses. There will also be hardware that bypasses this content fee, which will be quite a bit cheaper in comparison. The only way this has any chance of working is if MP3 players are replaced every year like cell phones. Not likely in my view, but replacement rates of cell phones and computers have exceeded my highest estimates.

To: slacker711 who wrote (58396)	11/9/2006 7:24:47 PM
From: aaplfan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 213182

I know that Microsoft desperately wants/needs a music strategy but I cant believe they would agree to this.... Why not? It's a page out of the playbook they've used for years: spread the money around and get everyone in the market you can pushing for your side. Who do you think the content providers are going to favor: Apple where they only get a cut of the content sale or Microsoft where they get a cut of the content and platform sales? Of course there are significant differences in what they face pushing Zune and previous scenarios. It is definitely interesting to see this play out.