Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (11421)	11/11/2006 4:19:31 AM
From: Elroy Jetson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 218109

You still can't believe BP was destroying value through the Orimulsion process, but they were. They destroyed more than $10 per barrel of value for each barrel sold! Today, they mix the deposits in the ground with a lighter crude and create a product with a profit margin over $10 per barrel more than Orimulsion. I guess no one at BP thought to combine the heavy oil deposits with oil instead of water. It seems obvious to most. Perhaps your work on water-powered cars misled you into thinking that water could be burnt as a fuel. Downgrading a heavy oil to the value of coal isn't what most would want to achieve. No doubt the ancient Winn family alchemists spent their time attempting to change gold into lead. .