SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Peter Dierks who wrote (4809)11/15/2006 10:52:22 AM
From: TimF  Respond to of 10087
 
The only groundswell that Congress will respect if the referendum. On a national level that means a Constitutional Amendment.

The amendment would have to be passed by congress with a two thirds majority, unless you anticipate having a new constitutional convention. The later method has never been used for an amendment.



To: Peter Dierks who wrote (4809)11/15/2006 12:02:04 PM
From: Jim S  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10087
 
"The only groundswell that Congress will respect if the referendum. On a national level that means a Constitutional Amendment."

If I remember how Constitutional Amendments work, they first require passage in Congress by a 2/3 majority, and then ratification by the states?

Both houses of Congress have their own internal rules for how they operate. It would only require changing those rules to permit a rating system to be used. As a practical matter, though, I agree that it wouldn't be very easy to, um, "encourage" them to enact such a system.

Just judging from the resistance to the idea here, among my fellow conservatives, it wouldn't be a very likely thing to happen. And, since it would be a fairly complicated process to establish a rating system, it isn't very likely that more apathetic Americans would ever learn enough about the process to force the issue.