Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Julian Augustus who wrote (25574)	11/15/2006 3:24:13 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78409

epm.wt.b - julian, i think the Bs are a better deal at current prices as they are cheaper by a nickel or so, and imho either epm.to makes it big, or they don't make it at all due to political risk ... so the seven-to-six ratio of B over A outweighs the .35 difference in strike, imho ... you also get an extra winter with the Bs, but that doesn't start till over four years from now, and a lot can happen in that time, especially in a place that near to so much oil and whacko religion In a case where epm sorta makes it, muddles on through with an half-success for several years, then yes the .35 difference would outweigh the 7-6 ... but i prefer to bet otherwise, i see them with either 1. major cash flow and a multi-bagger in shareprice, or 2. zippo, ripped off, another character-building experience