Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (146725)	12/1/2006 7:32:30 AM
From: edwin k.	Respond to of 152472

Not since the very beginning, but when it became clear that Q was going to be a dangerous opponent, that's when the "fight" really began. The early wars only strengthened Q, but this time around NOK etc are increasingly finding themselves up against the wall. Q has made inroads into Europe, something that will not be tolerated.

To: John Carragher who wrote (146725)	12/1/2006 10:24:27 AM
From: Dash of Reality	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 152472

John, I disagree... nok and eu been playing dirty since the beginning. NOK has been playing by the rules. The rules say all is fair in business. I don't own a single share of NOK and have way too much invested in QCOM. Every time I see NOK file a law suit or state their case in public, or try to manipulate EU policies, I also become irritated, but then I remember that if my investment was reversed how would I feel about QCOM? NOK is doing what it can to preserve it's place atop the wireless world. If you held a large investment in NOK wouldn't you want them to maintain there lofty position? My frustration is with QCOM. In my opinion they do not do enough to protect my interests as an investor. DoR