Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (944)	12/1/2006 1:04:58 PM
From: Done, gone.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1681

when you see this type of thing, you have to wonder about possible agendas "get it at all costs" type mentality I believe Cameila Anderson when she says she came here because her husband called her about the Star story, and she subsequently found her own name mentioned on-line, so she came here in an attempt to clarify, thus far unsuccessfully. I see no other agendas.

To: rrufff who wrote (944)	12/1/2006 1:28:31 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1681

No. We know way more. We know the bank confirmed the cheque was a fraud. Heck, even Petar reported the cheque was a fraud. Ergo, someone committed fraud. Who has the most to gain by this fraud? Normally (obviously), it's the one who receives the money or what was offered in return for the money. Since we can't locate the machinery, pin down who took it, or even that it ever existed, it seems most likely the person receiving the money had the most to gain. Ergo making the recipient the prime suspect, who apparently fled town, is simply logical. - Jeff