Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (218664)	12/2/2006 6:08:29 PM
From: gzubeck	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Ephud, your joking right? I can't see how "Phudster" is deeply disparaging...it could be construed as endearing in a back handed way...

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (218664)	12/2/2006 6:31:24 PM
From: mas_	Respond to of 275872

maybe he did not mean it as fudster but just added -ster to your name as some people do when being friendly, dunno.

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (218664)	12/2/2006 8:05:25 PM
From: Rink	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

K, Elmer doesn't want to be called Phudster. We should support that wish. Same as we did for at least two others before. Heatsinker, I'm sure you have no problem with that, right? The reason why I'm phrasing it this way is because fafaik Elmer didn't object to this use at previous times. Thanks, Rink

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (218664)	12/2/2006 10:07:04 PM
From: j3pflynn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

ephud - Oh, for heaven's sake! That was closer to a term of endearment than an insult!