Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (313602)	12/2/2006 8:29:37 PM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573592

I studied and still study discussions about GW for instance. "We firmly believe..." you better be careful here. Or "expert" opinions about smoking and its impact on the lungs. Have you ever looked up this matter in dictionaries and books from the 1930s? You would be surprised to read, that "we even believe smoking could have a beneficial effect and prevent TBC". Or "cancer almost never affects the lungs". In our time nobody - except maybe Philip Morris - would ever start a discussions about the causality between smoking and lung cancer like "we now believe...". Rather than "we" the pronomen "it" would take its place. "It is a proven fact...". The theories starting with a "we are now certain..." are almost always about matters subject to turbulent changes, sometimes to the opposite, as the "believers" (= the "experts") change minds about what they have no clue about. Taro