SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: plantlife who wrote (218981)12/5/2006 1:39:17 PM
From: dougSF30Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Yes, yes, we know what you're talking about, even though it is not called "code".

That doesn't explain it.



To: plantlife who wrote (218981)12/5/2006 1:58:43 PM
From: justaviewRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
There is nothing new in Rev. G except for 100MHz speed increments. C1E has been in 90nm. Just check Turion data sheets.



To: plantlife who wrote (218981)12/5/2006 2:15:08 PM
From: smooth2oRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
So, the claimed "power redux" has nothing to do with the 65nm process, it's simply slowing the clock...Intel parts do that too, maybe not to the same clock speed but I don't know why.

Smooth


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News