Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jspeed who wrote (219452)	12/7/2006 2:14:45 PM
From: dougSF30	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

You posted on a thread discussing die size, jspeed. Caris seems to think ~125 mm^2 is much smaller than their (crack-induced) expectations. Why are you not willing to make a prediction on die size, jspeed? And yes, an overly large die does indicate process difficulties. Especially when you combine it with lower performance. So, are you going to take a stand on the Brisbane die size, or just dance around the issue? My claim: 125mm^2 +/- 3mm^2 What's your claim, jspeed? If you don't have one, doesn't that make your posts "meaningless" and "worthless" by your own prior arguments? We're all waiting... your prediction, jspeed?