Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dougSF30 who wrote (219453)	12/7/2006 3:49:29 PM
From: jspeed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Oh, my bad. I thought I was on a thread discussing analysts and their drug addictions. Did Caris say what the die size was? No. Yet you said the analyst was "on crack". Could it be because it's not the die size you disagree with but the praise Caris heaps on AMD's process? Methinks you doth protest too much.

To: dougSF30 who wrote (219453)	12/7/2006 4:05:44 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Why are you not willing to make a prediction on die size, jspeed? Why were you not willing to put a number on your outstanding yield claim for Intel CWM? So, are you going to take a stand on the Brisbane die size, or just dance around the issue?. So are you going to take a stand on what % you consider Intel's CWM outstanding yields to be or are you just dancing around the issue? What's your claim, jspeed? If you don't have one, doesn't that make your posts "meaningless" and "worthless" by your own prior arguments? What's your claim, Doug? If you don't have one, doesn't that make your posts "meaningless" and "worthless" regarding Intel's CWM outstanding yields?. We're all waiting... your prediction, jspeed? We're all waiting .....your % definition of Intel's outstanding yields on CWM, Doug? THE WATSONYOUTH