Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (84019)	12/8/2006 4:23:52 PM
From: miraje	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 173976

1) Health standards were not the direct reason for removing lead from gasoline. Catalytic converters, which were introduced in 1975, require unleaded fuel. There is zero chance of that changing and that article doesn't suggest it will. 2) There was nothing in that article (and nothing in reality) in any way, shape, or form that supports your contention that Bush or anyone else is "pro lead gas". That's your fantasy and you're a liar for repeating it. Period. It clearly says Bushies are considering doing away with EPA standards on lead poison in our gas. Since you're retarded, I'll repeat this slowly and concisely, since you seem incapable of digesting what was written.. "No, it doesn't". It discusses revising allowable lead level discharges in the air, not in gasoline.