SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (219714)12/8/2006 5:02:27 PM
From: fastpathguruRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
This statement is not correct. They were determined by a investigative body to be in violation. That body had no enforcement power. Intel's side was never presented because the remedy was trivial.

Japan's FTC investigated Intel's business practices and issued a ruling. You're wriggling.

Is this proof? Of course not but AMD is involved in an anti-trust investigation, not Intel.

Actually, Intel is involved in several anti-trust investigations.

Germany/EU, South Korea...

What a turnaround this year has been!!!!!!

Getting a little ahead of yourself???????

fpg



To: Elmer Phud who wrote (219714)12/8/2006 5:15:03 PM
From: gzubeckRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Ephud,

I've got a couple of questions...how can you prove price fixing given that there were no huge profits obtained. How is the consumer harmed in this case if all the money was re-invested into R&D and support for the consumer? Given that intel has been making the lion's share of profits couldn't they easily have re-invested some of those profits into better graphics processors? Inquiring minds want to know...


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News