Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (314718)	12/9/2006 6:03:21 PM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571942

Some (currently unknown) process causes Antarctica and the surrounding ocean to warm. This process also causes CO2 to start rising, about 800 years later. You read again and maybe this time you don't ignore above in bold, OK? So we are now down to the fact - as alleged by your GW expert - that higher CO2 levels trailing trailing the elevated temperatures by 800 years or so as observed from the ice cores, still cause global warming albeit the next GW event only. Now assuming that our current man made Global Warming started around 1870 as claimed by your "scientists", that means the cause must be seriously elevated man created CO2 levels dating back to the time of the Normans invading the British Isles. Do the ice cores support that theory? Those Viking descendents and their nasty French habits imported to the UK at work, I guess. Anybody knows "farting" in French? Furthermore, unless we all sign off Kyoto and behave according to it, we can now expect a serious case of GW II in approx. 800 years if the theory of your expert is right on. Irresponsible indeed. As a true believer your choice may still be to hang on to your such monstrous theories and in a free society like ours, that is your own good right as well. Taro