Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (315063)	12/11/2006 10:28:15 AM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1587370

...but the remaining parties will be unable to live together peacefully. If there were plents of people saying as much, I sure don't remember them.... CJ, you conveniently left out your reply to the major part of Elroy's post disputing the main point of the post he disagreed with. taro

To: combjelly who wrote (315063)	12/11/2006 12:29:05 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1587370

CJ, > I don't think there was anyone who seriously doubted that Saddam would be easily defeated. I like how the naysayers tossed up a bunch of doom-n-gloom predictions, then celebrated when only a few of them turned out to be true. Here is what Scott Ritter said before the Iraq war: homepage.eircom.net I'm betting that Saddam's gonna be around a lot longer than anyone can predict. I'm betting that we don't capture Bhagdad. I'm betting that we stall outside Bhagdad. I'm betting that this becomes an absolute quagmire. Tenchusatsu