Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lhn5 who wrote (18420)	12/16/2006 12:35:41 AM
From: Frank A. Coluccio	Respond to of 46821

Hi Lhn5. I'm glad you took the time to look through and comment on Medcommons. The company certainly has some work to do on its site, I'll grant you that. Although, it is admittedly still in the final stages of its development stages, so it's not unreasonable to cut them some slack here. It's not often that I go to a site's "About Us" page and find only the bios of management and founders. Please get back to the board with the answers to the questions you sent once you've received them, and thanks for the follow-up. FAC

To: Lhn5 who wrote (18420)	12/16/2006 3:16:20 PM
From: jrforster	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 46821

I am also impressed that it seems like almost anyone can fax data into someone's file if they have a pin code I think there's also an ID. Machine IDs that humans never need to type can be 32 or 64 bit random numbers, or proper cert, in either case its infeasible to guess the ID. ...but in that regard the crucial question is once the fax gets into the record, how does the software know WHERE in the heck to put it? Well, if the fax from the Dr. contains his ID, then it can be authoritatively stored as a report from your Dr. and filed as such. Of course, much, much better is for the Dr's systems to send properly formatted XML, encrypted and signed, over the net. -- Jim