Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DayTraderKidd who wrote (7772)	12/17/2006 1:50:34 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15987

Voilence growing more voilent if we leave is a myth. Voilence(sic)?? So why would the liberals, like Clooney, call for UN intervention in Darfur, if your logic dictates that violence will not decrease as a result? In fact, applying your logic to the situation in Darfur would mean that intervention would be a recipe for even greater violence. Seems a bit illogical to me. Hawk

To: DayTraderKidd who wrote (7772)	12/18/2006 10:24:00 PM
From: Keith Feral	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15987

I don't think we need more troops, seems like we are all talking about scaling back our management of this Muslim bloodbath. As you stated, the Shiites will be able to do far greater damage to the Sunnis once we are gone. Maybe that's why there are so many Iraqi refugees right now. I wonder how many of them are Sunnis. Ironically, Al Quaeda needs us in Iraq to save their heads, literally. I think we should let the Muslim democracy decide what is best for it's own people in Iraq. It won't be pretty when we hear about the Shiite retributions against the Sunnis. It will breed Muslim hatred against the West, part 47.