SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: quehubo who wrote (76522)12/18/2006 8:28:01 PM
From: Frank  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206166
 
Well , there is red and there is RED. I don't know about you but seeing all those red probabilities confuses me as my mind translates it to really hot rather than a probability of above average. A good example is one of the posters here thought it was going to be 80 F in Ohio when the probability was 80% AN. I can understand that mistake and wonder if the visuals are distorting our view of reality a bit. After all 13 AN very different that 2 AN. I know Que has access to better data so I listen to what he says carefully. Nevertheless,the extent of deviation may control our destiny for a while--Frank



To: quehubo who wrote (76522)12/18/2006 8:55:59 PM
From: LoneClone  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206166
 
RJ was not talking $10 in January, but $10 later in the year as various factors they discuss (and others including the usual increase in consumption YOY) take hold.

LC



To: quehubo who wrote (76522)12/18/2006 10:33:05 PM
From: energyplay  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 206166
 
The price projection of $10 may be WAY off, unless we get a Hurricane in the Gulf in January. But the longer term shortage of Canadian gas means a bullish environment after a bearish winter and spring. Could be some nice buying / trading opportunities.