Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (316386)	12/19/2006 3:55:17 AM
From: 10K a day	Respond to of 1576336

Bush attacked iraq to stop saddam from dumping cheap oil on the market. Bush then tried to connect iraq to some fantasy he calls a war on terror. Any questions?

To: Elroy who wrote (316386)	12/22/2006 1:22:45 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576336

Hmmmm.......you see no connection between the violence in Iraq and the Bush invasion. I've never written that. Stop projecting my thoughts for me - like everyone else, you're getting it wrong. I am not projecting your thoughts........the way you think is so alien a psychic would have problems. Are you human? Having said all that, you did say the following in a post: "Bush hasn't made a single Iraqi strap bombs on himself and kill 10-50 Iraqi peasants in the local marketplace. The bomber (and his handlers) are responsible for the bomb...." Whether you intended to or not, those comments suggest you see no relationship between Bush and his invasion, and the violence in Iraq. If that's not what you meant, you might want to be more careful in what you say. Then you might not be so misunderstood and reviled.