SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MFIC Corp. (MFIC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kinkblot who wrote (998)12/20/2006 9:38:47 AM
From: RikRichter  Respond to of 1150
 
Wednesday, 20 December 2006
MFIC Corporation Makes Statement

LOS ANGELES, CA (NAMC) - Late yesterday OTC Bulletin Board traded stock MFIC Corporation (OTCBB: MFIC) issued a statement that they have no clue what prompted the recent high volume in the stock nor the decline. Lets chime in on this one, what may account for these events could be the fact that the company hired an investor relations firm on December 7, 2006. The purpose of an investor relations firm is to increase investor awareness and in turn potentially increase the volume as investors take positions in the stock.

The second possibility is the fact that on December 14, 2006 the company hired the brokerage firm Taglich Brothers to initiate coverage of this company. In the real world not too many OTC Bulletin Board companies receive analyst coverage so the next best thing may be to purchase that analyst coverage.

According to Taglich Brothers even though they get a monthly retainer their outlook is unbiased.

In any event I found this statement interesting enough to write about, and I guess it was necessary to make such a statement for the purpose of transparency. I do not know much about the company and usually would not comment on a OTCBB company but I couldn't resist.

David Kingston
Business News Correspondent
NAMC Newswire
www.namcnewswire.com



To: kinkblot who wrote (998)12/20/2006 9:52:54 AM
From: Will Lyons  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1150
 
I called Gruverman when he signed the deal but i guess i did not have enough shares to impress him with my concern!



To: kinkblot who wrote (998)12/20/2006 10:16:38 AM
From: tom pope  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1150
 
Agree totally with your view of the Taglich association



To: kinkblot who wrote (998)12/20/2006 10:25:14 AM
From: RikRichter  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1150
 
How many BB companies have Wall Street research analysts covering them without paying a fee?