Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rambi who wrote (213702)	1/20/2007 2:44:54 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

So your position is no abortion ever (other than the mother's life being in danger), which I assume means that the products of rape or incest must be carried to term, or that a mistake by a 13 year old hormonally challenged child can't be undone, or that we shouldn't do testing for Downs or other disabilities that give parents choices. We can go there after the majority of birth control abortions are stopped. Using an exception to defend abortion on demand fails. Unless you think the majority of 1500000 abortions a year are due to rape, incest, birth defects...