SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jttmab who wrote (213786)1/20/2007 9:51:59 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 

I wonder if a human clone will have a soul?


It is already a problem for those who think that 1) conception marks the start of a human being, and 2) there is such a thing as the soul which all humans have.

Monozygote multiples (like identical twins) separate up to a week+ (IIRC) after conception, i.e. it is a single entity until the split. Does the soul also split? Or does the being not have a soul until safely past that critical time. Note that if the division comes to late, you get progressively worse conjoined individuals (something like 10-15 days I think). There are intermediate problems like fused placenta and twin blood sharing that happens for the intermediate times. Are their souls conjoined? Is it a sliding scale, just like the range of physical bodies? Does one body & 2 heads equal one or two souls? What if the brains are progressively fused? I like to know the boundary conditions.

I have not found any scholarly religious articles which attempt to address this profound issue. Most likely because nobody has a clue what the imaginary soul is anyway. However, I'm surprised that some religious scholars haven't had the bright idea that this explains the Trinity, three-in-one concept. They're just monozygote triplets, in which case, they were truly a single individual to start with, hence one soul and one being, even though they split into three physical parts.