SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (214370)1/24/2007 12:53:27 PM
From: Katelew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I so totally agree with all you have said. With sonograms, logic dictates that abortion should be considered 'murder'. As I said privately, I'm completely fractured in my thinking about abortion rights, i.e. would I be willing to legally force my personal opposition to abortion onto other women? I honestly can't decide.

Yes, studies have shown 30 year declines in crime has been most dramatic in states where abortion rights are most accepted and available. This is an important consideration.

However, having personally helped my oldest daughter and husband adopt an infant last March, I know there are many more families wanting to adopt than there are available infants. There's no need, Mike, to compel anyone to take the child of an unwanted pregnancy anymore.



To: michael97123 who wrote (214370)1/24/2007 1:00:07 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
I don't see why some middle ground can't be reached by the left accepting much stricter limits on abortion, and the right accepting much better teaching and funding and availability of birth control methods.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News