Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (214381)	1/24/2007 1:14:40 PM
From: Katelew	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I agree and think there is movement on both sides. One of the few things I respect the Rep party for doing over the last 15 yr. period is to make a big fuss about abortion and sharpen people's thinking. It has put a big dent in the cavalier attitude the public had had toward abortion.

To: neolib who wrote (214381)	1/24/2007 1:48:18 PM
From: geode00	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Get rid of capital 'punishment' - state sponsored murder - first. Second, fund the basics of a good and decent life such as national health care. Third, stop going into wars of choice. The argument about pro and anti choice isn't about the morality or ethics of life, it's about authoritarianism and blatant hypocrisy. When anti-choice goes hand-in-hand with capital punishment and war and general thuggishness, it's clear what the anti-choice crowd is really about. Anti-choice is not pro-life it's pro-birth. Right after birth said baby can starve to death for all the anti-choice crowd cares.