Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (214611)	1/25/2007 11:05:42 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The "threat", is the threat to the US. IF Bill thought there was a big threat, then Bill was wrong- but at least he didn't invade Iraq over it, so you have to give him that. I'd say the same for papa Bush. Good decisions by both leaders- a rep and a dem. I understand that the threat to the US is/was the issue. I felt that there was no immediate threat at the time, and said so at the time. However, looking at the conduct, comments, and persona of Saddam Hussein, I don't see how anyone could conclude that he was doing anything but biding his time until the dismantling of the sanctions. Bill Clinton's comment was spot on. IMO