SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (194107)1/25/2007 1:26:53 PM
From: Gersh Avery  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793964
 
norml.org

An inhailed version of marinol is being developed.

It's odd because one of the primary reasons that the DEA backed marinol is that it wasn't inhailed.

Again .. policemen make poor doctors.



To: Bill who wrote (194107)1/25/2007 1:41:48 PM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 793964
 
Slight change of subject, Michael Crichton lately has been pointing out that the fact that a paper is published in a peer reviewed journal is NOT a guarantee of quality. He says this is well know and being debated amongst scientists.

Are there any peer reviewed studies on the medical effects of inhaled versus marinol?



To: Bill who wrote (194107)1/25/2007 1:43:31 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793964
 
Slight change of subject, Michael Crichton lately has been pointing out that the fact that a paper is published in a peer reviewed journal is NOT a guarantee of quality. He says this is well know amongst scientists and what to do about it is a hot topic being debated by scientists.

Are there any peer reviewed studies on the medical effects of inhaled mariuana versus marinol?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News