Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (758216)	1/27/2007 9:23:10 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Re: I believe John Stuart Mill suggested that those with higher education should get a "larger" vote - that might not be a bad idea. Because those in academia know best. /sarc Outrage as Oxford bans student for being Israeli telegraph.co.uk

To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (758216)	1/27/2007 10:56:32 PM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

hey jerk.... tell us about shillary's military past...where did she serve?......and barak hussein obama? where did he serve?

To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (758216)	1/28/2007 11:42:04 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Respond to of 769670

Re: "Sounds like they tore a page from the "Swift Boat" school of smear." YEP! The similarity in tactics has been commented upon. :-) "Its a beauty - you raise racist based fears about Obama and attribute it to Hillary - talk about killing two birds with one stone." Yep. A well-delivered double smear. (Of course, if 'people associated with a Clinton opp-research effort' were the ones actually responsible for starting the ball rolling on the Madrassa smear... as the Moonie mag 'Insight' claimed... then maybe it's appropriate to say it was a 'single-source smear', not a 'double smear'. Perhaps Insight turned it into a 'double' by reporting a 'Clinton connection'... whether in fact there was one there or not...) Impossible to say, since no one goes on the record, and NO NAMES are sourced. Very sloppy but, as you point out, likely also VERY EFFECTIVE (& certainly extremely CHEAP. :-)