Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Katelew who wrote (215415)	1/29/2007 2:55:08 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 281500

If you really cared about women's rights, and the rights of injured women to a fair trial, you wouldn't defend a man who sexually harassed a subordinate, and then lied about this and other similar acts when she sued him. Whether he sexually harassed Monica, another subordinate, on the job (as he did) is exactly the type of evidence that is admitted into trials for sexual harassment all over the country, every day. No man is above the law, no man gets a "pass" on sexually harassing a subordinate. What he does with his actual private life in his spare time with non-employees is indeed his personal life. Getting a blow job by a government employee in the White House while she's on the clock is NOT his private life. I continue to be astonished at feminist double standards.