Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kirk © who wrote (28291)	1/29/2007 5:29:30 PM
From: queenleah	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 42834

Is that like telling his [Brinker's] newsletter subscribers to stay fully invested while on the radio he told someone with a "fresh" $300,000 who was considering real estate or the Stock Market .... to look at CDs? I don't know if that call happened, but if it did, perhaps Brinker was considering several factors relative to the individual--like age, expressed risk tolerance, plans for the future, etc. I don't think Brinker is much of a "one size fits all" kind of advisor. Just a thought. (Excuse the "buttinski" :).) After all, considering the questions of individual investors and their needs is the reason for a call-in radio show.

To: Kirk © who wrote (28291)	1/29/2007 6:08:03 PM
From: Math Junkie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Are saying one part of his newsletter has QQQQ as a buy while another has them as a hold? No, Honey is the one who said Brinker had different QQQQ recommendations in different parts of the newsletter. I don't see anything that Brinker wrote that supports that interpretation. Message 23226369 I'm saying that during the time he was recommending QQQQ for purchase from late 2000 to mid-2001, he had everything EXCEPT QQQQ on hold, and that he didn't put QQQQ back on hold until the June 2001 issue (which is also the issue in which he stopped recommending it). In any event, I can sure see how David Korn has done so well trying to interpret what Brinker says on the radio!! What good are interpretations if they are not authorized by Brinker? It's just one man's opinion.

To: Kirk © who wrote (28291)	1/29/2007 6:35:29 PM
From: Honey_Bee	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 42834

Kirk, I doubt that you are the only one who hasn't followed this debate between Math and me. He has refused to accept brinker at his own word and has tried spin brinker's words in such a way that I can envision even brinker blushing. . Just a word to the wise...save your breath (typing fingers). Do not let him suck you in on this because he has no intention of using any logic whatsoever and he will just turn it back on you. If I were you, I'd bow out now, just as I FINALLY did. I proved my point several times over that brinker differentiated between his Individual List and his three QQQQ countertrend rally calls, but every time I offered proof, math just came up with a different spin. . Then of course, we have her highness, the queen of nasty in the background all royal and indignant yelling: off with honey's head!!!! :) . .