SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mistermj who wrote (216381)2/5/2007 4:21:17 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 281500
 
According to many international lawyers he DID have to go back for a 2nd. Now you may think he did not, but there are good lawyers out there who disagree with you, and it's pretty clear Bush could NOT have gotten the authority to invade Iraq. That at least you know, right? so if the UN would not have given him the authority to do it, trying to say the UN authorized it is pretty silly, imo. I hope we lose in court. It's a terrible precedent to let the legality of this stand, imo.

I'm not sure how happy you would have been if China decided to unilaterally enforce it. Thrilled? Would you be thrilled?



To: mistermj who wrote (216381)2/5/2007 4:26:12 PM
From: GST  Respond to of 281500
 
If China had invaded and occupied Iraq it would be that same as our invasion of Iraq -- illegal.



To: mistermj who wrote (216381)2/5/2007 4:31:08 PM
From: SARMAN  Respond to of 281500
 
oy! it is just a game for Bush and his friends to make money.
video.google.com


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News