Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : SiliconInvestor All Stars Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KyrosL who wrote (28)	2/12/2007 4:45:21 PM
From: NOW	Respond to of 1718

it did not perform any better than most metals is very different than its not good for gold

To: KyrosL who wrote (28)	2/12/2007 6:59:32 PM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1718

gold+/- doubled in 5 years, beating shares in the aggregate, and ought to prove its worth by either doing so again, or hold its purchasing power during any and all downward repricing of other stuff <<But commodities are destined to go back into the basement on a permanent basis, once world population peaks and starts declining sometime in the next few decades>> ... it is not clear that the world population will decline in sum total, perhaps just the spendthrift lots here and there so, perhaps the commodity cycle will resonate with the war cycle, and create a super boom