SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : SiliconInvestor All Stars Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jimmg who wrote (29)2/12/2007 4:38:28 PM
From: da_cheif™Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1718
 
no he.s not on roids....he.s just 10000% dedicated.....there are people like that u know



To: jimmg who wrote (29)2/12/2007 5:08:28 PM
From: SouthFloridaGuyRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 1718
 
Would it matter though? Putting is 1/2 the game.



To: jimmg who wrote (29)2/13/2007 6:47:08 PM
From: Proud DeplorableRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 1718
 
"Anyone here think Tiger Woods is on steroids? I do."

Yes but I also hear he's a swinger.





Wonder if he'd share his wife. >vbg<




To: jimmg who wrote (29)2/15/2007 10:06:59 PM
From: THRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 1718
 
jimmg,

<Anyone here think Tiger Woods is on steroids? I do.>

Tiger would never do steroids. Do you know why?

Because Tiger is chasing history named Bobby, Jack, and Morris (young and old). Tiger does not want an asterisk in the history books stating he was the greatest steroid using player to ever play the game. He just wants it to say he is the best ever, period.

And that is why sometime in the next ten years Tiger will win all four majors in a calender year, simply because he hates the asterisk for his current <Tiger Slam> (which was four consecutive major wins, but not in a single calendar year).

And he will do it without steroids, period.

GT
TH