SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush Administration's Media Manipulation--MediaGate? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (9588)2/19/2007 10:12:56 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9838
 
How about the way the entire arab world characterizes Americans or Jews? They teach hatred to little kids in school...

GZ



To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (9588)2/19/2007 10:23:18 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9838
 
"Believe it or not, sometimes "disdain" is called for,

I don't believe that your claims are valid and I have said so. When I challenge you on any of your claims, you whine that I am name calling and run away or ban me.

If you believe that all Muslims are deserving of disdain, and that the proper thing to do is incite others to have disdain for all Muslims, and you are willing to stand behind that position when I challenge you on it then I would have some respect for you. However, that act is one which has zero tolerance for the members of a group. It is only valid when you admit to that condition. It is one that has categorically made negative assumptions about any member of that group. It is one prejudiced against Muslims. That qualifies it as bigotry. Do you object to me using the term because it has become more of a taboo in our culture than the actual actions of prejudice toward others? Or do you object because you are afraid it places you in an indefensible position? (I'm not referring to the cult thread where you have plenty of defenses).

Its a straight question. The word bigot is a legitimate word when used to label the attitudes and conduct described above. Hiding behind the 'name calling' taboo is not a straight answer to the question.



To: Proud_Infidel who wrote (9588)2/20/2007 7:56:55 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9838
 
The hypocrite speaks:

It would be clarifying if you would either come out honestly and declare yourself as one who hates all Muslims or as one who wants to route out the evil that is being perpetrated in the name of Islam.

But will he "come out honestly and declare himself" a moslum? Not in 1,000,000 years, because he's too ashamed of himself and of his own people and is too cowardice to say so...<g>

The world is full of those types of cowards...

GZ