SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (220363)2/22/2007 3:35:13 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 281500
 
I try to explain this to you slowly so you can understand...do you detect an insult in what I just said, if not, then you are even dumber than I thought. Ok, I see now that you are in fact that dumb and you think that I'd be offended by what you think Mohammed said. I don't give a daman what he said and you don't have any proof that he did in fact ask the same question.

However the question is a logical one, no matter who asks it. And for you to call it naive and not answering it is a slimy way out. That was what I objected to.

It is one thing if you consider the Bible to be the literal Truth. But since you said that you believe there is human error in it, then just how much faith can you have in an error prone document?



To: Ilaine who wrote (220363)2/22/2007 3:48:06 PM
From: Katelew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I don't know why you would consider Sun's questions naive!!!

How much validity to attach to scripture is a natural stumbling block for everyone......jew, christian, or muslim.

Trying to connect with God or to know the character of God by reading scripture for oneself is a huge and difficult undertaking.