SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (327752)3/1/2007 2:09:19 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1577108
 
"All of this really avoids the main question: Why should we ever give in to North Korea's nuclear brinkmanship? "

An excellent question. I suppose the answer has to do with 90% or so of the population being within cannon range of NK. Nuclear or not, Dear Leader can kill a substantial percentage of South Korea's population in a very short period of time.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (327752)3/3/2007 4:01:52 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577108
 
CJ, > It doesn't say that. What it does say is that NK didn't have any nuclear weapons until we broke our side of the deal. And it appears as if we broke our side of the deal over something that might not have even been happening.

Coulda, shoulda, woulda ... why do we even have a CIA in the first place if they don't provide any actionable intelligence

What would you suggest?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News