SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: limtex who wrote (60705)3/2/2007 5:52:22 PM
From: JeffreyHF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 197007
 
Limtex, you are creating a straw man. Nokia does not claim to have worked around Qualcomm`s patents. That was what they hoped to do when WCDMA was being standardized, but it was impossible. Contrarily, they concede the essentiality of Qualcomm`s IPR, but claim they have more patents now that deserve commercial credit in any new cross-license. Unfortunately for them, with HSDPA/HSUPA, which arose from Qualcomm`s HDR research and patents, Qualcomm`s portfolio has also grown substantially in size and significance.



To: limtex who wrote (60705)3/3/2007 3:30:10 AM
From: Raglanroadie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197007
 
"1. Although NOK signed a license for W-CDMA a few years ago the position has now changedas MOK has developed a work-around of Q's patents"

How do you have a work-around within a CDMA standard? I have always thought of the original work-around as using some other technology to achieve similar results. A WIMAX/GSM phone might be considered a work-around capability wise but how do you continue to make WCDMA phones and say you have worked around anything?