Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Uranium Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: energyplay who wrote (8733)	3/3/2007 3:40:31 PM
From: Tommaso	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 30203

There is tremendous variety in the location, grade, depth, geology, milling resources, available capital, expertise of personel, and other factors among the increasing panoply of entities that might be called "uranium companies." As I posted, I am invested in 21 companies, including the smallest of small caps (Glen Hawk). But when I make suggestions for other people, I don't want to be responsible either for getting them into money-losing situations or for trying to pump my own holdings. I don't imagine myself as a guru whom anyone would pay any attention to anyway, but in the past I have accidentally caused a few people to jump into investments where they had no business being. So it seems best to stick to the producing companies as the most important recommendations. Of the hundreds of uranium "explorers," very few will be able to get into production. The most promising seem to be the in situ operations that will revive known deposits. I think your arguments apply best to UEX and JNN, which are making incredible discoveries and work in concert with Cameco, Areva, and Denison.