SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (222576)3/5/2007 8:34:03 PM
From: Don Hurst  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
>>" I'm sure it was just by sheer coincidence that the Baathists and Al Qaeda emerged joined at the hip in the Sunni insurgency, right? They couldn't have planned anything, now could they?

And of course, all the links beetween Saddam's IIS and Al Qaeda - listing OBL as an intelligence asset, sending training in poison gas to Afghanistan, training Islamist terrorists from all over the Arab world in Salman Pak, none of that counts as a tie, right?
"<<

Right, but you forgot to add "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (222576)3/5/2007 9:11:20 PM
From: SARMAN  Respond to of 281500
 
I'm sure it was just by sheer coincidence that the Baathists and Al Qaeda emerged joined at the hip in the Sunni insurgency, right? They couldn't have planned anything, now could they?
Your stupid people did not plan for that, did they?



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (222576)3/5/2007 10:02:17 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
It would appear that you, like Cheney, still think Saddam was responsible for 9/11. Ouch, there is no hope for rational choices in that case.