SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Claude Cormier who wrote (35016)3/5/2007 7:48:21 PM
From: 4C  Respond to of 78405
 
Thank you Claude - eom



To: Claude Cormier who wrote (35016)3/6/2007 1:11:26 AM
From: marcos  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 78405
 
cuu.v - hi Claude, i think part of what was holding Copper Fox back is that they are way out in the boonies, there would be huge infrastructure costs for them to set up by themselves ... recently though ng.to has been making plans for Galore Creek, and roads/power/etc there will greatly benefit cuu.v ... Schaft Creek is massive, if you had that orebody in Nevada or Coahuila it would be worth a whole lot more today than it is now ... and if Teck does back in, it will pay off in fine style, and quickly, as they'll have no trouble getting financed

Not good enough for koan though - it's 'only' a gold/copper play -g-



To: Claude Cormier who wrote (35016)5/9/2007 4:44:28 PM
From: 4C  Respond to of 78405
 
Claude, if you are out there, I would appreciate if you could share your thoughts on the Copper Fox news release.

ca.us.biz.yahoo.com

Many Thanks,
SF