SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy who wrote (223095)3/8/2007 8:47:55 AM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Actually most Muslim states have more of a separation of church and state than people think. Pakistan for example is a fiercely Islamic state and yet has had a female head of state (something that I believe is against strict interpretation of Islam).

On the other side, you should look into some of the religious policies that are recently enacted in Germany. They clearly favor support of Christianity in the country. It is not as secular as you may think.

So the separation of church and state is not a black and white thing. The government always has to take into account the public sentiment. Even in the US, where the constitution explicitly calls for such a separation, we still have people who fight it. In countries where 99.99% of the population is Muslim and most of them practicing/devout Muslims, then the state HAS TO cater to religious authorities.

On top of this there is also the issue of politics. Politicians everywhere use whatever they can to sway the public opinion towards their own position. Muslims politicians, like all other politicians, do not shy away from manipulating religion to keep their power.



To: Elroy who wrote (223095)3/8/2007 10:00:56 AM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
>> No, I thought the question was prove how in a given time period Muslims have used their power to dominate and force conversion of others.

I'd be willing to debate this also, for the example mentioned. Considering that the Mogul Caliphate lasted 330 years and ruled over much of India, how do you explain that the state did not force conversion to Islam across the land during those 330 years?