Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (35447)	3/9/2007 11:39:54 AM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78421

Right, 'half' was not the word to use, unless you say 'half a gramme per tonne' .... should have said 'a good part of' ... still though Claude, consider your scenario - say, gold at 1600, copper at 2.00 ... now it's half -g- .... cuu printed 1.48 this morning, there's my loonie/sh profit, with two cents left over for commission, so that kinda makes up for others that chose today to sell off or snooze goz.v, mlm.v, wkm.v - ever look at any of these? ... you'll know GD from Cumberland, of course ...

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (35447)	3/9/2007 12:31:01 PM
From: jackjc	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78421

Don't neglect the substantial value of the moly in Schaft Creek, though dependent on moly price of course. They show a large value at 6.00 moly but moly could well sell better than that long term. NG Galore Creek does not show a moly ore value. Though the gold and cu grades are lower at Schaft the moly brings it back up so they are comparable deposits gradewise. CUU also has a huge advantage on the weather front, never mentioned. NG has to contend with heavy snowfall drop, while CUU has relatively little. How this will impact the mining is a question.