Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (228285)	3/17/2007 8:22:40 AM
From: paarl99	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Or maybe it's just that $110 vs. $8 difference in share cost compared to their only competitor. //////////////////////// meaning??..this doesn't penetrate!! Paarl

To: Dan3 who wrote (228285)	3/17/2007 10:43:49 AM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz	Respond to of 275872

>> You've personally posted that you can't understand what's holding the stock price up. Maybe you've just answered your own question - underwriters and OEM customers have seen test results that led to them buying stock. Of course it is a possibility. There is a problem in it, though, which is the law against selective disclosure. If AMD has shown finaciers more info than they've shown the public, then the disclosure law is violated. However, if they've simply done a better job of convincing financial analysts (without showing another hard demo), then that's legal, and can lead to the strength in the stock. But then, there is still a problem with this theory, which is the most recent analyst ratings have all been downgrades. So I don't think analysts have been persuaded of AMD's coming strength, either. For me it's one of them mysteries that will be resolved in six months.