Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (224855)	3/21/2007 10:09:17 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Interesting article. Wonder if anyone else heard that Lieberman is close to switching parties, thus giving the Republicans back the Senate. If Joe did do that, he would be stabbing Ct voters in the back. He would never have won as a republican and to switch now because of perceived personal and political insults and hurt for purposes of revenge and perhaps a committee chair is really beneath the decent man we thought joe was---even those who disagreed with him have thought highly of him up to now. Maybe he has his eyes on the VEEP spot in 08 on the Republican side?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (224855)	3/21/2007 10:49:36 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

That was one of the fairest partisan left leaning posts I've ever seen submitted to this thread. " In the meantime, since Bush is going to be Bush, let Pelosi be Pelosi and Petraeus be Petraeus — and hope for the best." Have Peace, Gem

To: stockman_scott who wrote (224855)	3/21/2007 2:27:23 PM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Friedman is back-pedaling from his rah-rah war stance of years past. The schmuck is playing any side of the game depending on the facts on the ground.