Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (90809)	3/21/2007 7:33:45 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 173976

First off, its not just Armitage that says he is the source. Novak says it and Woodward confirms Armitage told him the same thing. Why in the world would Armitage lie to make him potentially a target for indictment? Assuming that telling anyone Plame was CIA was a crime, which apparently it wasn't since Fitzgerald knew and didn't indict Armitage. And your logic that because Armitage wasn't charged "proves" that Plame was not covert is totally ass backward logic. It doesn't prove anything. If Plame was covert under the law, Armitage should have been indicted. He wasn't. So Fitzgerald either believe a crime wasn't committed or he was an incompetent corrupt prosecutor who failed to indict someone who was admittedly guilty. You may not like the conclusion but its inescapable.