SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (61304)3/22/2007 9:13:35 AM
From: mindy1968  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197214
 
Carranza - the resident lawyer - then why did Q say "The record refects the absence of an evidentiary basis necessary to support an exclusion order or a cease and desist order under Commission and Federal precedent"?

Also why did Q state that " Broadcomm's assertion that the statute requires the Commissision to issue its requested exclusion order and a cease and desist order in this investigation because the Commission has found a violation is INCORRECT under the law and facts of this case"?

Thanks.



To: carranza2 who wrote (61304)3/22/2007 9:43:25 AM
From: waitwatchwander  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197214
 
Mindy makes a good point about the rule of law. Is the ITC considered an inferior court under Article III, Section 1 of the US Consitution?

law.cornell.edu

Thx

ps I would of sent this your via PM but I couldn't.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News